| 
				
				Margaret Murphy, Annandale 
				
				Apr 22, 2008
 
 I have been reading with interest the letters and articles about 
				the 1922 school 
				building which is part of the Annandale Middle School. I 
				attended the informational meeting on April 9 and appreciated 
				Supt. Niklaus taking the time to provide information and field 
				questions. Although I do not have children in the school 
				district I appreciate the need to provide excellent learning 
				space for the kids. The fact that the learning space is also 
				architecturally interesting and aesthetically pleasing is a 
				bonus for our community but not the main reason to maintain a 
				building. What I did learn at the meeting is that the entire 
				current middle school site is structurally sound. The 
				1922 building has already proven the test of time and the 
				remaining additions according to the superintendent are "built 
				to last." Currently the middle school is large enough to 
				accommodate its current student body with room to grow, as the 
				third floor of the 1922 
				building is not being utilized. It was pointed out that the 
				middle school site is currently landlocked and the 11 acres is 
				under the recommended standard set forth by the Minnesota 
				Department of Education. We did not receive information that the 
				land site size was impeding the education of our children, only 
				potential future additions. Considering there seems to be no 
				evidence of massive growth to the school district, it would seem 
				a simple solution of expanding the land site would be to develop 
				a plan to purchase adjoining properties as they become available 
				for sale. Supt. Niklaus provided information on various project 
				costs. According to that it is more cost effective to conduct 
				the maintenance that has been deferred these years than tear 
				down and rebuild. New windows, tuck-pointing, roof replacement 
				and heating-cooling upgrades are standard upkeep for all of us 
				as we maintain our homes, or in this case a school. It is only 
				good stewardship of our school buildings and taxpayers' dollars. 
				A decision to phase out the middle school seems to be a 
				long-range plan for increased spending on land and new 
				construction. All of this considered I believe it makes sense to 
				maintain the current site and provide the necessary 
				improvements. I believe that everyone that is looking at this 
				issue is to be commended. Many people gave of their time to be 
				on the Facilities Task Force, carefully considering the 
				information that was provided to them. Many faculty and district 
				staff have provided information, leadership and vision for the 
				current and future needs of our children. And many community 
				members have voiced their opinions and support for the future of 
				our school district. It is a reminder how much this community 
				cares.
 |