Letter in the Annandale Advocate, April 22, 2008 - with their permission:

Practice good stewardship

Margaret Murphy, Annandale

Apr 22, 2008


I have been reading with interest the letters and articles about the 1922 school building which is part of the Annandale Middle School. I attended the informational meeting on April 9 and appreciated Supt. Niklaus taking the time to provide information and field questions. Although I do not have children in the school district I appreciate the need to provide excellent learning space for the kids. The fact that the learning space is also architecturally interesting and aesthetically pleasing is a bonus for our community but not the main reason to maintain a building. What I did learn at the meeting is that the entire current middle school site is structurally sound. The 1922 building has already proven the test of time and the remaining additions according to the superintendent are "built to last." Currently the middle school is large enough to accommodate its current student body with room to grow, as the third floor of the 1922 building is not being utilized. It was pointed out that the middle school site is currently landlocked and the 11 acres is under the recommended standard set forth by the Minnesota Department of Education. We did not receive information that the land site size was impeding the education of our children, only potential future additions. Considering there seems to be no evidence of massive growth to the school district, it would seem a simple solution of expanding the land site would be to develop a plan to purchase adjoining properties as they become available for sale. Supt. Niklaus provided information on various project costs. According to that it is more cost effective to conduct the maintenance that has been deferred these years than tear down and rebuild. New windows, tuck-pointing, roof replacement and heating-cooling upgrades are standard upkeep for all of us as we maintain our homes, or in this case a school. It is only good stewardship of our school buildings and taxpayers' dollars. A decision to phase out the middle school seems to be a long-range plan for increased spending on land and new construction. All of this considered I believe it makes sense to maintain the current site and provide the necessary improvements. I believe that everyone that is looking at this issue is to be commended. Many people gave of their time to be on the Facilities Task Force, carefully considering the information that was provided to them. Many faculty and district staff have provided information, leadership and vision for the current and future needs of our children. And many community members have voiced their opinions and support for the future of our school district. It is a reminder how much this community cares.